Welcome to the MM  page of Maarten Maartensz. See also Help + Map + Tour + Tips + Notes + News + Home

 

 


1. The design
2. Designed with FrontPage 2000 - with problems
3. Wasting time with MicroSoft

4. More warnings for naive and defrauded users


1. The design

The design of this site incorporates the following features:

This site:

  • is large: over 20 MB text, over 1200 files, over 35 directories

  • is easily traversed by The Map

  • has a common and recognizable interface: See Help

  • has a general Notes to this site availiable in Help and The Map

  • has a clear structure

  • has clear filenames

  • has clear titles

  • has backgrounds and a design that are aimed at clarity and ease of reading

  • incorporates html + frames and standard bitmap-formats only, and no cascading style sheets

The site hasn't fallen from the sky: it was developed consciously with these ends in mind, which again arose from experience with earlier sites and html.

It should also be noted what the other tools are I made this site with, since these determine how I see it, which may be rather different from how it may display in your browser:

  • a 366 Mhz computer

  • a 1024 * 768 screen setting with 16-bit colors

  • a 56K modem

  • MS Internet Explorer 5.0

The speed of your processor probably doesn't make much of a difference as long as it is fast enough to go on the internet. The screen setting may make a considerable difference. I much prefer the stated one, having looked for 10 years at ugly computer screens with a low resolution. (Here the speed of your processor probably is relevant.) The speed of your modem is mildly relevant in that there are many files on my site, some of which are long (100 Kb or more). Since there are no large bitmaps included, even these files should download rather quickly. (Incidentally, the different styles of displaying my files - Topped, Left menus or Full Screen - should make little difference in downloading time, since these involve only very small files.)

Finally, I think MS Internet Explorer 5.0 is a better browser than Netscape and I don't even have Netscape on my drives since it insisted on giving me "Your Weekly Horoscope on your Personalized Pages" after I had indicated I want no such thing, and also sent me weekly "Feel Good" prose meant for the likes and mentalities of Fred Flintstone.

So I do not know how my site displays under Netscape, and until AOL has developed a considerably better browser - they ought to have the money to do so! - I won't even look at it again.

 Back To Top.

2. Designed with FrontPage 2000 - with problems

This site was made mostly with FrontPage 2000 version 4.0.2.2717 (or so it says), legally bought and registered. This program is in some ways very helpful and in some ways a real pain.

FrontPage 2000 has also some irritating bugs - this version, at least - and no own help or included paper documentation of any value.

These issues I will treat later.

Here I only have this warning:

If you are an individual or small business, at least where I live such providers as you can find that you can pay or is free, generally run Unix. This entails that they generally do not run the MicroSoft Server Extensions. These are necessary to use the Unique Selling Point of FrontPage: its Cascading Style Sheets. Therefore, you can only use FrontPage 2000 as advertised, including Cascading Style Sheets, if your ISP runs MicroSoft, which generally means you have to pay your ISP a considerably monthly sum.

This "feature", which MicroSoft seems to include in its effort on ousting Unix, is not announced on the box FrontPage sells in, and not said - in clear words - in its documentation.

The result is that you may buy FrontPage to use a site designed with Cascading Style Sheets and do so .... and find your site cannot run at your provider's site.

Back To Top.

4. Wasting time with MicroSoft

I've meanwhile lost at least a month of my life and time on undocumented "features" and bugs in FrontPage 2000, and also half a day on MicroSoft's ill-organized and hyped sites.

Not even my provider is big and important enough for MicroSoft to have its complaints answered - so I won't spend more of my life on trying to bring this to MicroSoft's attention through their usual non-working and non-answering channels.

Speaking as a 50-year old academic with degrees (also) in computing and 14 years of daily experience with computers, it seems to me the only reason not to sue MicroSoft for my lost time due to their false announcements and hyped "information" is that they employ other good legal academics to design licenses that make MicroSoft liable to absolutely nothing - except scorn, satire and scatology from its deluded and defrauded users.

And no: This scorn, satire and scatology should not be directed at the actual designers of FrontPage. It's the sales-techniques, hype, and lousy documentation of MicroSoft salespeople that's to blame.

Anyway - as US Judge Jackson may have time to point out to MicroSoft: If MicroSoft is finally legally cut down to size and quartered into bits, it is because MicroSoft has lost its morals (if it ever had any) as it gained its monopoly. Also, in the end it is good business practice not to deceive your users. And "all power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" (Lord Acton).

Back To Top.


Maarten Maartensz
Feb 29, 2000

 


More Frontpage 2000 warnings:

1. Warning about crashes

I still use Frontpage 2000, having bought it because of improper and misleading reviews, and having little money to invest in something better, like Macromedia's DreamWeaver.

In any case, the reader who uses FP 2K should keep in mind what I just found out again:

MicroSoft does not believe in exception-handling, and does not put it into its code, it seems to me:

Whereas good programs at present all save your work in the background, and allow you to go back to a recent version in case of crashes, FP 2K does no such thing.

Hence it may happen to you what just happened to me:

You are busy for an hour on a text; suddenly - simply because it doesn't know how to handle all keyboard input - it crashes, irrecoverably and immediately, and all your work is gone (even if you have been saving it, for it is saved in a temporary file MicroSoft will not recover for you).  Back To Top.

2. Warning about links

You can not make hyperlinks on consecutive lines, in FP 2K: Such links will merge with the previously existing hyperlink on the next or previous line (and FP 2K will not tell you it does so).

The only way to avoid this bug I found is to put in two breaks before and after such links I want to make (that happen as a matter of course in the plainest html!); then make the link; and then remove the breaks I put in. (It makes me feel like in the early CP/M-days, 15 years ago - except that these days I get angry about such unnecessary enormous ineptitude.) Back To Top.

3. Warning about dll-s and reinstalling FP 2K

For months, FP 2K immediately after being started up trundled for 5 to 10 minutes, allowing me no access whatsoever to my computer, and then irrecoverably crashed with the message "Insufficient memory for division through zero" - which itself is a piece of utter nonsense, although it is true absolutely everything in the processor (registers, flags) indeed was zero after such crashes.

I reinstalled FP 2K in all available ways, both partially and fully: No difference, and no information, and no help (all as usual - and incidentally, I work on a completely ordinary system).

Recently, I found out FP 2K suddenly deigned to start up properly again, I suppose because finally and by some fluke I installed a dll it needs but that it has not been programmed to tell it needs (although this would be very easy to program). Back To Top.

4. Warnings about html-editors

I have tried many and found most wanting. The reason I found most wanting is that the cheaper and simpler ones, and also some that are neither cheap nor simple, lack proper site-maintenance.

Site-maintenance is in fact a database compiled by the editing program that maintains hyperlinks, so that one does not need to rewrite them by hand or reintroduce them otherwise if one moves or renames a file (as will happen often in practice).

If, like me, you maintain a site with tens, hundreds or thousands of files, you absolutely need a html-editor with proper site-maintenance, or else you'll end up thoroughly insane. (This is not so if your site has a few files only.)

This is the only reason I still use FP2K:

It does site-maintenance, and other html-editors I have either don't do this at all, or don't do this well.

And if you do want to use hyperlinks in any extensive way, linking to  more than a few files, you'll find that you need site-maintenance, at least in the sense that the links you made are preserved (rewritten by the program) if you move or rename the files they link to.

Next, there are some hardened nerdy types who will tell you that what you really need is a plain html-editor in which you normally edit html rather than the text it will produce.

This is nonsense of the masochistic kind: In general, it should be possible to write a WYSIWYG html-editor that also allows you to edit the html if required.

And to finish on a positive remark: FP 2K does have this part of its editing fairly well organized (as do many other WYSIWYG html-editors). Back To Top.

5. What you can rely on with MicroSoft software

What you can rely on with MicroSoft software with perfect assurance and certainty is that it will let you down in more undocumented ways than you think possible, and that there will be no help, no information, and no redress from MicroSoft.

What you can also rely on with MicroSoft software is that it will be hardly debugged, will be ill documented, in prose that is not English but a kind of Newspeak, and will promise you all manner of things that are absolutely untrue.

And what you also can rely on with MicroSoft software is that whereas really good programmers work for other firms, MicroSoft specializes in employing real top lawyers selling tenth-rate software with many bugs and holes but no legal redress - for the one certain thing you'll find is that its software will let you down and crash at the most inconvenient moments, for no apparent reason at all, but MicroSoft's top lawyers will have foreseen that and any other eventuality, and sealed all possible forms of redress or repair (rather than straightening out their bugged code, which indeed is less easy and more expensive).

MicroSoft probably knows less about good software and more about lawyers' tricks and traps than any other computer firm in business.

Maarten Maartensz
July 12, 2000

Back To Top.