
Waar het mij om gaat:
Het meest schokkende feit

"Het meest schokkende feit" heb ik de afgelopen 20 jaar vele honderden keren aan vele
honderden burocraten, artsen en Nederlandse medemensen uitgelegd - of
althans: ik heb dat even zovele malen geprobeerd uit te leggen, maar - enige
uitzonderingen daargelaten - het succes van al die verschillende persoonlijke
en schriftelijke pogingen tot uitleg was hoogst beperkt.
Dit is op zichzelf een zeer interessant feit,
dat het een en ander of mijzelf en mijn Nederlandse medemens duidelijk maakt
- voor wie dergelijke waarheden onder ogen durft te zien. Ik ga daar op
verschillende plaatsen in het Nederlands op in, zoals maar citeer hier maar
twee recente pogingen het in het Engels uit te leggen, aan twee mensen die
het inderdaad wel begrepen.
De eerste is een Engelse professor filosofie
("Metaphysics and Logic") - en ik citeer dat deel van mijn mail dat
"het meest schokkende feit" betreft
- geel op rood, voor de slechte Nederlandse verstaander:
|
I will soon upload a new extensive website, given to
philosophy, logic and ME/CFS, among other things - "ME" and
"CFS" being common abbreviations for the disease my ex and I
caught in January 1979, in the first year of our studies, and which we
both still have, though it did not prevent either of us taking degrees
(while preventing many other things).
Part of the last subject will
be something autobiographical called "ME in Amsterdam", which is
about my - and her - experiences with an unrecognized disease in a
supposedly highly civilized, rich and free country and the cognitively and
morally very interesting forced experiment of having to tell many people
"I am in pain, I have little physical energy, I would like some help
to cope" - and NOT getting it for all manner of purported reasons,
that mostly came down to this being the most convenient course for those
we asked.
Not all doctors and bureaucrats were equally obtuse, but most were. It was
also cognitively and morally interesting to find after 10 years that
hundreds of thousands in the world had had very similar experiences - and
to note yet 10 years later that still little has improved for those with
ME/CFS.
So in case my prose and my
opinions differs from that of others, this is part if not all of the
reason: I have very disheartening experiences with "I told you
so" - and it was not a mere matter of being academically right
or wrong about some rather abstract and speculative contention: I was simply telling the literal truth
about the pain and lack of energy I myself and the woman I loved suffered
from, and it is a very instructive experience, if not a pleasant one, that
explains much about the worse fates of so many other individuals in this
century in Europe: their fellows preferred not to care what happened to
their fellows or preferred to actively persecute them for being -
supposedly - different.
Speaking for myself, I often abbreviate my sort of philosophy to four
words: "Be rational! Be reasonable!". It is humanly possible,
but very difficult.
|
Vervolgens. Tussen 1979 en 1989 dachten mijn ex en ik dat we een zeer
zeldzame onbekende ziekte hadden - en tussen 1989 en 1999 bleek dat er vele
honderdduizenden andere mensen (soms ook paren: zie G.C. Fisher: "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome")
zeer soortgelijke ervaringen hebben moeten doorstaan met medici,
hulpverleners, burocraten en medemensen.
In een zogeheten "Vrije Democratische
Rechtsstaat" zou dat een zeer
verbazend feit moeten zijn - maar dat is het helaas vrijwel alleen voor
ME-patienten, hun huisartsen, en hun familie en vrienden. Ook is het zo dat
sommige ME-patienten met familie en vrienden actie hebben ondernomen in
Nederland en elders, met het doel de positie van mensen met ME te verbeteren.
Afgezien van een veel grotere naambekendheid van ME en een aanzienlijk
makkelijker erkenning van het bestaan van ME als ziektebeeld (en niet als
inbeelding of simulantie om de WAO op te lichten - wat in Nederland zonder
twijfel OOK gebeurt, maar iemand als mij, immers een eenvoudig Nederlands
Bijstands-Untermensch, onmogelijk is) is er weinig verbeterd aan het lot of
de positie van de meeste ME-patienten.
En zoals gebruikelijk zijn er wel nogal wat
zelfbenoemde ME-specialisten, hulpverleners, actievoersters (m/v) die
allemaal Het Beste willen voor "de" ME-patient, en zichzelf, en
zeer stellige oordelen hebben over hoe ME-patienten als ik zich zouden moeten
opstellen.
Hier is een deel van een e-mail aan de beheerder van een Engelse site over ME
- in dit geval een voormalig zeeman met ME:
|
Well then, here are a few deliberations about "ME in Amsterdam", also related to the
fact that when I disclosed my project to the people behind MEdium their
angry reply was "What good would that do ME-patients?" - for
whom they pretended to speak.
1. Me and ME:
I am ill now for nearly 21 years, and so is the woman whom I lived with
when we both got ill. In those years I had very little help, also by those
who pretend to speak for "ME-patients", and it has emerged that
if I don't help myself others won't do so either - whatever I ask, plead
or say.
Indeed, I am one of the few Dutchmen whose ME is officially admitted by
all manner of institutions and doctors - which is a feat few or none
others in my position have achieved, and which I did not achieve by kindly
asking it, but by being better documented, better academically qualified,
smarter and more persistent than those I was forced to deal with.
Likewise, unlike nearly everyone else who got ME, I succeeded in finishing
my academic studies (brilliantly, and in spite of extra-ordinary
opposition and difficulties), as indeed did the woman I lived with (who
also has a very high IQ, and has a degree in psycho-physiology, having a
similar distaste as I have for the softer and more non-mathematical fields
in the so-called 'science of psychology').
Now I regarded myself as someone quite special in intellectual terms long
before I fell ill, and I had an excellent career-prospect before I fell
ill, where by "excellent career-prospect" I mean that I have
talents which should have secured me a very succesful and highly
remunerative career - always apart from debilitating illness and other
things, such as my unpopular philosophical and moral opinions (that nearly
all date also from long before I fell ill: the main thing my illness did
was sharpen my pessimism about
most humans).
Most people with ME have no moral right to regard themselves as special in
such terms, and if they did they probably have long since learned to
discard their illusions.
2. Others and ME:
In my case and that of my ex ME is officially admitted as a diagnosis
since 10 years, but I am hardly helped by that since I was a student when
I fell ill, and had minimum income. I still have a minimum income, while
it seems that most Dutchmen who have, believe they have, or pretend they
have ME were working and thus keep receiving their full salary while ill,
or a sizable part of it.
This also means that in Holland a complaint like ME is ideal for
malingerers, and that I suspect a sizable proportion of those who claim to
have ME while receiving health-benefits in fact do NOT have ME but have a
reputable excuse to go on long well-paid holidays or stop working in a job
they don't like while keeping their earlier affluence through the Dutch
system of health-benefits.
Also, "others with ME" are rarely in a position to help me or
help
themselves, and in Holland
it seems that there are considerable problems, quarrels, fights etc.
between various self-apppointed spokesmen and spokeswomen for "people
with ME".
Since I met some highly disturbed such types in 1989, and since the main
spokeswoman for "people with ME" in Holland is a former radical
feminist, apparently also not of sound mind, I avoid these Dutch
interest-groups like the plague (and indeed have also no problems or
quarrels with them).
3. Me and others
I differ from all other people I have met in my life, and did so before
falling ill. It is this difference that enabled me to achieve what I have
achieved while I was ill, and that has prevented others from achieving
something similar, whether or not they had ME.
One of my fundamental assumptions is that nearly all men and women are
born followers: In the end they will do as some leader tells them, conform
to peer-pressure, believe what ordinary people believe, and act like
almost everybody else - also inside Auschwitz or on the battlefield, and for fundamentally apish reasons.
I am not one of those, and neither were my parents. People like me go
their own individual way, and are generally strong enough to defeat almost
any individual opponent (or get killed in the fight). This makes people
like me when intellectually gifted well-known academics or philosophers,
and it also makes people like me when not theoretically brilliant or
interested either political leaders, important criminals, or well-known
dissidents.
In democratic Europe, the
majority of average men and women have let themselves be convinced by
their hypocritically flattering elected leaders that each of them is as
good as anybody else. Well, that's a misconception: Nearly everyone lacks
the talents to be a great academic, a great criminal or a great leader -
but there are a few who do (and not all of them are savoury individuals,
and indeed nearly all of them are not what one would think of as
sympathetic popular persons). Numerically, the proportion of such individuals
is considerably less than 1 per 10.000. Also, these people are not only
naturally creative, but naturally destructive: they go against the common
norms without individual fears or doubts.
4. ME and human rights
What people with ME mostly do not seem to see or do not want to face is
that they are each and all, when they really have the disease,
discriminated in a very distasteful and inferior way, largely because such
discrimination appeals to either the financial greed, the sadistic
impulses or the simple egoistic convenience of not helping one in need of
help by those who commit the discrimination.
I wrote earlier (to one of your countrymen):
"Part of the last subject will be
something autobiographical called "ME in Amsterdam", which is
about my - and her - experiences with an unrecognized disease in a
supposedly highly civilized, rich and free country and the cognitively and
morally very interesting forced experiment of having to tell many people
"I am in pain, I have little physical energy, I would like some help
to cope" - and not getting it for all manner of purported reasons,
that mostly came down to this being the most convenient course for those
we asked. Not all doctors and bureaucrats were equally obtuse, but most
were. It was also cognitively and morally interesting to find after 10
years that hundreds of thousands in the world had had very similar
experiences - and to note yet 10 years later that still little has
improved for those with ME/CFS." It seems
to me that all action about ME has achieved extra-ordinarily little in
this crucial respect: It is still the case that health-professionals and
bureaucrats are completely free to discriminate you when you have claims
like mine, and it is still the case that the majority do. I believe such
discrimination is inherent in the average human heart, that likewise
discriminates Us from Them in all manner of cases, usually while
pretending falsely that "everybody is as good as everybody
else", and that no amount of preaching about prejudices will change
that.
5. Me, ME and the Dutch law
While having ME my life has
been twice three years very credibly threatened, first by a psychopathic
neighbour in a student flat, and then by insane harddrugs dealers. In both
cases I was repeatedly credibly threatened with murder; in both cases I
and others went to the police; in both cases the police and every other
official institution for three years refused to do anything whatsoever in
the matter, except assure those who threatened me that they were completely
free to do so. The reasons did could happen and continue happening for
three years are my disease and poverty, which prevented me from finding or
buying another place to live, and the Dutch endemic bureaucratic
corruption and incompetence (few Dutchmen are prepared to face, for it
does strike only those who cannot defend themselves, and facing Dutch
corruption and incompetence are extra-ordinarily unpopular amongst the
Dutch, who like to think of Holland as the closest thing to a divine
utopia that is humanly possible, and enshrined this self-adulation in the
term "the Polder-model of Democracy"). So I believe that I, in
my position, have both the right and the duty to claim large damages. What
"good this would do for patients with ME" is not my primary concern,
though it is obvious that if I succeed it will do good to some patients
with ME, viz. me. Whether my claims will be honoured during my life is
doubtful, but that's no reason not to make them. Also, I think my story
"ME in Amsterdam" simply is interesting for those concerned with
Dutch civilization and Dutch history, while it also - when put on CD
together with a lot of other material - may make me some money
commercially. Also, I think I
ought to explain what someone like me was forced to spend his twenty years
between ages 30 and 50 on, that he could have spend so much better and so
much more profitably, if only he had had a little help or if only his
human rights had been maintained instead of willfully destroyed by corrupt
or incompetent politicians and bureaucrats.
Unfortunately, I live in Holland where any politician or any bureaucrat is
much sooner believed by the population they parasite on than a poor and
ill person without status or power.
Regards,
Maarten.
|
Colofon:
first: 27 Oct 1999
last: 28 Oct 1999
Naschrift Augustus 2000: Wat mij overkwam in "Onze Democratische
Rechtsstaat" is natuurlijk materiaal voor zeer interessante maar weinig
optimistisch stemmende verklaringen van de gruwelen van de 20ste eeuw.
Kortweg: wie zich geroepen voelt tot het zijn van een burocraat of bestuurder
is gewoonlijk uit dat menselijke, morele en intellectuele hout gesneden dat
nu juist geen macht over medemensen zou mogen krijgen.
© Maartens@xs4all.nl
|