On the BMJ Editorial and professor Malcolm Hooper's letters
Here is a link to my take on my site on Sir Michael's "reply" to professor Hooper and the foregoing exchange:
"ME: Excellent letter by professor Malcom Hooper + "NICE" "reply":
"Professor Malcom Hooper answers a "NICE" "reply""
And here is also my take on the BMJ-Editorial by McClure and Wessely
"ME: On the postmodern falsifications in Wessely & McClures BMJ-editorial"
P.S. Also posted a little earlier in the thread "BMJ Editors invited to Invest in ME Conference". (I hope it works since the forums software has another attack of dysunctional programming...)