essential English leadership secret does not depend on
particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably
stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that
when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up
their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous."
I am not at all well, because I don't sleep well because of what my
dysfunctional brain these
more than 32 years
of ME maintains is pain, that I cannot possibly have -
except in my dysfunctional imagination - according to professors
White, Sharpe and Chalder, whose careers, personal well-being and
status depend on maintaining that someone like me, who has a disease
that is not yet understood, for that very reason has no disease - and
therefore, in the opinion professors White, Sharpe and Chalder, must
have a dysfunctional brain, that madly imagines itself in pain, while
White, Chalder and Sharpe have been spinning this story to the world
for over two decades now that persons like me are just making up
things or imagining things, in my case since over 32 years, with the
best possible MA-degree in psychology.
Here is their very own recipe, from a man I
have learned in the University of Amsterdam is their exact human
equivalent, according to Dutch norms also sanctioned by the Dutch
parliaments and governments since more than four decades now, and
whose equivalent assistant, who clearly must have been a constant
inspiration for messrs. Wessely, White, Sharpe and ms. Chalder, and
others of similar education, outlook and interests in life, since they
have practised the lessons and examples of these men with great
personal success and deep personal satisfaction for over two decades
All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite
true within itself--that in the big lie there is always a
certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are
always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional
nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive
simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big
lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small
lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale
falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal
untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the
impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts
which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they
will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may
be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves
traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is
known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire
together in the art of lying.
To the point, which is this:
Mr. David Tuller published last week a fine piece in
the New Tork Times about ME/CFS and the way the research has been
systematically fucked up - purposively: these folks know what they are
doing, and love doing it - by the pseudoscience emanating from the
English professors White, Wessely, Sharpe and Chalder, who for more
than twenty years have refused to follow proper scientific procedure
in their so-called "evidence based medicinal studies", by the
following trick - and I quote myself from March 13 and before - and
PACE is the latest bit of pseudoscientific psychobabble:
whole PACE-rot is what one gets if one "researches" all "fatigued"
individuals as if they suffer from the same disease,
conveniently labelled Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, in wilfull denial
of the WHO, that calls it ME since 1969, and insists it is a
neurological disease, and then applies
to a subgroup with a serious neurological disease.
This is pure fraudulence, pure pseudoscience, and it has been
done and is being done on purpose. See:
On natural philosophy, philosophy of
science, and psychiatry, in particular the end: Psychiatry
is pseudoscience since its inception, and the reason is that there
just is not the requisite knowledge of the brain to support almost
any of it.
I really think that I know that the PACE-trials
are pseudo-science, and intentionally so, by its English perpetrators:
I know too much of philosophy of science, methodology, statistics and
psychology to think otherwise: It is bullshit, the perpetrators know
it is bullshit, but they publish it nevertheless as if it were
science, because they can get away with - very few or none who have a
career in science want to get entangled with this human type of
malignancy, for it would risk their own careers - and because they are
the type of persons that glorifies in the miseries and pains of
"The mild and the long-suffering may suffer forever in
this world. As long as the patient will suffer, the cruel will kick."
-- Sidney Smith
When a White, a Chalder and a Sharpe gets a chance to
kick tyhe long-suffering, they will do it, for they are - I say it as
a psychologist - this manner of persons.
In proof of which is here their letter to the NYT, the
text in blue, my comments indented in black:
Fatigue Illness (1 Letter)
The title is a lie designed to suggest by
innuendo ME/CFS is not really an illness but a dysfunctional belief
system that one is in pain when psychiatric sadists tell one one
cannot be, because they would know why if one was.
Published: March 14, 2011
To the Editor:
an Illness Is Fodder for Debate” (March 8), your reporter
David Tuller correctly noted that the way an illness is defined can
often determine what is found in studies of it. He also suggested
that this problem of definition had limited the interpretation of
our trial of treatments for
chronic fatigue syndrome, published
recently in The Lancet. That is not the case.
They are lying and know they are lying, and also give no evidence
The patients in this trial had a disabling
chronic illness in which fatigue was their main symptom
This is a lie: The symptomatology is described for laymen here:
Canada Clinical Consensus definition of ME/CFS for laymen,
and for medical professionsals
here, but these three liars who love to torment ill people via
their publications since decades do not even mention any biomedical
research by real scientists of ME/CFS. They lie all the time, and
while lying lie that they don't lie, and manage for dismiss, not
mention, discard, bury or keep secret all the evidence they are
lying: See my
Williams vs White + Feynman vs Wessely
and for which no alternative had been
found; that is the definition of the syndrome used in Britain.
And it is a false, misleading, unscientific and irrational
definition, that is inconsistent with that of the World Health
Organization and at least 5000 papers of biomedical scientists over
the last 55 years, and was apparently contrived on purpose to
falsify a real disease without known aetiology into a psychiatric
ailment these liars can make money from, and kicks out of:
"As long as the patient will suffer, the cruel will kick."
-- Sidney Smith
But we also assessed trial participants to
see if they met two other definitions of the illness that are
favored by some scientists.
And they lied, and misrepresented, and even to this day have not
published the raw data of the basis of their own lies an
misrepresentations in the PACE-study
We found that both cognitive behavior
therapy and graded exercise therapy, when added to specialist
medical care, were most effective not only in the whole sample but
also in the participants who met these alternative criteria.
That is a lie but a clever one, for the mechanism is as I
described above: Their "sample" was very carefully selected to
exclude everyone who showed evidence of ME/CFS as defined by the
Canada Criterions and to include everyone with psychiatric
complaints without any sign of disease - for these liars study the
disease they call CFS and insist falsely is the same as ME by
excluding from their samples everyone who shows evidence of being
These liars did not study patients with ME, like I have since
1.1.1979: They studied patients they made methodologically as sure
as they could do not have ME, by insisting that the sample
only includes persons without sign of non-psychiatric
disease... and then presenting that as "evidence based medicine"
that people with ME are not really ill but nuts, since they claim
they feel ill.
In addition, these treatments were the most
effective whether or not a patient was depressed,
If one has taken care, as White, Chalder and Sharpe did, that the
group you researched consists of nutters, anything may be "proved"
by "evidence based medicine".
Besides, persons who studied this pseudoscientific "research
paper" more closely than I did say this too has been tricked,
massaged, and padded with innuendo and propaganda-talk.
And since when are voodoo-"scientists" the right persons to
objectively pronounce on the real biomedical science that would
refute their lies if applied rationally?!
a not uncommon accompaniment to this
chronic and misunderstood illness.
These types cannot forbear not to make any innuendo they can make
- "As long as the patient will suffer, the cruel will kick." - but
do not admit that this illness is misunderstood because they
themselves have for over 20 years done their utmost to confuse its
proper biomedical study and by insisting, without any rational
evidence, it is not a real disease, and the WHO consists of
incompetents or nutters compared with them, if they do not suggest
the WHO consists of liars.
In any case: According to the WHO, to this day, ME/CFS is a
neurological disease that is explicitly, since 1991, not
Psycho pseudoscientists in psychiatry like White, Chalder and
Sharpe will never publicly admit it, if they can get away with it,
just like astrologers do not want to have anything to do with real
physicists, and conmen do not want to meet the police.
The trial also found that these treatments
were safe so long as they were provided by appropriate therapists
trained to help patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.
Another very crafty and very degenerate and immoral lie: What
many thousands of patients with ME have insisted on since decades is
that "these treatments", and especially
forced exercise, are dangerous, painful and cause serious setbacks,
for weeks, months or years.
The "appropriate therapists"
envisaged by White, Chalder and Sharpe are their own henchmen, with
their own hangups and desires: "As long as the patient will suffer,
the cruel will kick".
So to Mr. Tuller’s question “Does the
evidence from that study prove that these strategies would help
patients identified as having chronic fatigue syndrome through very
different criteria?,” the answer is “Yes, it does.”
Again, pseydoscientific types like White, Chalder and Sharpe -
who most be mental cases themselves, since they insist without
evidence that millions of ill people with ME are not really ill, but
are mental - are just the type of voodoo-
"scientist" who insists that their voodoo will do better than real
Patients and their doctors now have robust
This was probably one main reason for White, Chalder and Sharpe
to write this: To once again affirm the thing that is not, namely
that their pseudo-science constitutes "evidence"
of any kind but that of scientific fraudulence, as indeed has been
perpetrated ever since Charcot and Freud: See my
More on Freud and psychiatry and
Excellent reply by professor Hooper - 55 points, for here
are 55 points liars and frauds like White, Sharpe and Chalder are
will never publicly discuss with a scientifically qualified
audience: Frauds like they are perpetrate their pseudo-science
through the media.
that there are two safe treatments
To even suggest that Graduated Exercise Therapy is a "safe
treatment" is, in view of the great variety of evidence by
patients and by real medical scientists, fraudulent medical sadism
of truly sickening dimensions, and is as honest about the "safe"ness
of the treatment as the Nazis were about the healthiness of
concentration-camps - "Arbeit macht frei!".
You do not force ill people to exercise, and if you try to do so
nevertheless you ought to be in prison. Here is how the spinners of
Fox "News" spun the news as White, Chalder and Sharpe want to see
the news spun:
Pushing Limits Can Help Chronic Fatigue
Helping chronic fatigue syndrome patients
to push their limits and try to overcome the condition produces
a better rate of recovery than getting them to accept the
illness and adapt to a limited life, new research has found.
It's an untruth, but it is the kind of lie White, Sharpe and
Chalder have been producing for two decades now - with which they
also must have driven hundreds of Englishmen to suicide with: No
help, no benefits, and an enormous amount of falsehoods about one's
illness, while one is left to rot miserably, without help or money,
all thanks to White, Chalder, Sharpe c.s.
that can improve both symptoms and quality
of life, however the illness is defined.
Of course they can't forbear to appeal, like Stalin and Mao, like
Beria and Kang Feng, to their enormously good intentions - and of
course they lie, for their misdefinition of the disease was designed
to keep them doing their whole lives what they evidently love most:
"As long as the patient will suffer, the cruel will kick."
-- Sidney Smith
P. D. White
London and Edinburgh
As Frankfurt said so well about the
human, moral and intellectual type of these three:
"For the bullshitter (...) is neither
on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not
on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar
are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in
getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he
says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them
up, to suit his purpose."
Frankfurt, "On Bullshit"
To the above text Mr. Tuller had an excellent reply in the NYT,
The writers are the principal investigators of the PACE
David Tuller replies: The article asked whether findings
among a population defined by one set of criteria would apply to
populations defined by “very different criteria.” In this study, all
participants were first defined, identified and selected not by
different criteria but by the same criteria, the so-called Oxford
criteria used in Britain. Subgroups within that already screened
population who also meet secondary criteria are not easily compared
to patients who have not been screened, since an unknown number who
met the secondary criteria might not have met the study’s criteria
for inclusion. The gold standard for making comparisons across
groups of patients identified by three varying case definitions
would be a study with three completely separate cohorts, not one
large sample with two embedded subgroups.
I probably will return to this, for I would like to
know from these people this
"Hey, hey, hey
How many men did you kill today?!"
and in the course of their careers: I sure would love
to see "evidence based science" about this issue.
What number is it, in 20 years, Peter Denton White, Michael
Sharpe, and Trudie Chalder:
The blood of how many English men, women and children
are on your hands? Tens? Hundreds? Thousands? Give me some
"evidence based medical science":
"Some kill with a sixgun
Some with a fountain pen"
aka "This Machine Kills Fascists".)
How many?! How many?!
(*) The writer of the opening quote
is Joseph Goebbels; the writer of the text on
the Big Lie is
Adolf Hitler. It is the basis of both propaganda and advertisements,
and it is the basis of such prose of professors Wessely, White,
Chalder and Sharpe about ME/CFS - they call "chronic fatigue", much
like Hitler and Goebbels called Jews "Untermenschen": These
psychiatric pros seem to look upon patients with ME as Hitler and
Goebbels looked upon Jews:
"The mild and the long-suffering may suffer forever in this
world. As long as the patient will suffer, the cruel will kick."
-- Sidney Smith
Incidentally, it is true that I learned by direct logical
implicaton in the University of Amsterdam that Hitler and Goebbels
are the exact human equivalent of White, Chalders, Sharpe and
also Wessely, and indeed so were my
very own father, grandfather and mother. I denied this myself in
the University of Amsterdam because I believe
my very own father, grandfather and
mother were not - but
in thanks for my
protests I was removed from the University of Amsterdam "as a
fascist and a terrorist" briefly before taking my MA in
philosophy, because the Board of Directors at the time insisted that
"all human beings are equivalent", from Einstein to Eichmann, from
Mandela to White, from Sacharov to Wessely - all equivalent to
Eichmann, to Hitler, to Goebbels, and indeed to others as well. (See
Scientific Realism versus Postmodernism
for the rationale of this Entwertung aller Werte: Bastards and
conmen profit enormously by Big Lies.)
And no... I would not deny this equivalence with Nazis about
either White, Chalder, Sharpe or Wessely nor about the Board of
Directors of the UvA, though.
There are very evil men, and women too, and they usually do their
evil with a public appeal to the noblest sounding reasons and
motives, and insistence that they mean very well, and whoever
says not is impolite, a liar or insane.
P.S. Whatever needs correction has to wait, and
it may be that there is no Nederlog the coming days in view of my
dysfunctional beliefs that I am very tired and in considerable pain
the last days, probably for lack of sleep because of pain.
professor Hooper on the PACE-trial is really very good.